| Register
Jojo Gabinete: Cabinet Files

Warning before you watch and share Paolo Bediones sex video

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 12:22 am on Monday, July 28, 2014

Luma na ang alleged sex videos ni Paolo Bediones na kumakalat sa Internet at pinagpipistahan ng mga tao na mahihilig sa mga iskandalo.

Walang bago sa alleged sex videos ni Paolo dahil normal na ginagawa ito ng mga  babae at lalake na may relasyon, ng mga mag-asawa, at maging ng mga prostitute.

Maingay ang alleged sex videos ni Paolo dahil celebrity siya na nagkamali na i-record ang intimate moments nila ng kanyang mga partner.

Minalas lang siya dahil nag-leak o napasakamay ng ibang mga tao ang kanyang private video.

*******

Another Hayden Kho Jr. ang tawag kay Paolo dahil sa alleged sex videos na parang bomba na sumabog kahapon, July 26, sa social media.

Hindi tama na ikumpara si Paolo kay Hayden dahil may mga pagkakaiba sa sitwasyon nila.

Sa sex videos ni Hayden na kumalat noong 2009, hindi alam ng mga sex partner niya na may hidden camera na nakatutok sa kanila.

Sa alleged sex videos ni Paolo, may consent ang kanyang mga partner dahil alam nila na naka-on ang video camera.

*******

Bago pa lumitaw ang mga sex video ni Hayden Kho, nauna nang natsismis na may sex video scandal si Paolo pero walang kopya na kumalat.

Ang TV host na si Boy Abunda ang isa sa mga nakaalam tungkol sa balitang may sex video scandal si Paolo.

Kahit may mga materyal na puwedeng gamitin, hindi gumawa ng report si Boy tungkol sa sex video na ibinibintang kay Paolo bilang respeto sa kasamahan niya sa television industry.

*******

Naglabas ang TV5 ng official statement bilang suporta kay Paolo.

Hinihintay ng mga sumusubaybay sa kaso ang paliwanag o official statement mula kay Paolo.

Para sa amin, wala nang dahilan para magpaliwanag si Paolo.

Hindi naman niya ginusto na kumalat ang alleged sex videos dahil walang taong matino na ilalagay sa kahihiyan ang sarili.

At kung siya man talaga ang tao na mapapanood sa mahigit sa tatlo na sex videos, naging careless lang si Paolo at tiyak na pinagsisisihan na niya ang kanyang ginawa.

At the end of the day, mas mahalaga pa rin ang aral na kanyang natutunan.

*******

Naisakatuparan noong February 15, 2010 ang Republic Act 9995 o Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 dahil sa sex videos ni Hayden Kho.

Luma na ang mga alleged sex video ni Paolo na kumalat at patuloy na kumakalat pero protektado siya ng R.A. 9995.

Marami pa rin ang mangmang sa batas dahil pinaiiral nila ang curiosity na mapanood ang mga sex video scandal na kinasasangkutan ng mga popular personality.

Nakakalimutan nila na may mga pananagutan sila sa batas kaya ipinapaalaala namin sa kanila ang mga nakasaad sa R.A. 9995.

Section 4. Prohibited Acts. It is hereby prohibited and declared unlawful for any person:

(a) To take photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual act or any similar activity or to capture an image of the private area of a person/s such as the naked or undergarment clad genitals, public area, buttocks or female breast without the consent of the person/s involved and under circumstances in which the person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy;

(b) To copy or reproduce, or to cause to be copied or reproduced, such photo or video or recording of sexual act or any similar activity with or without consideration;

(c) To sell or distribute, or cause to be sold or distributed, such photo or video or recording of sexual act, whether it be the original copy or reproduction thereof; or

(d) To publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or broadcast, whether in print or broadcast media, or show or exhibit the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or any similar activity through VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and other similar means or device.

The prohibition under paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) shall apply notwithstanding that consent to record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given by such person/s. Any person who violates this provision shall be liable for photo or video voyeurism as defined herein.

Section 5. Penalties. The penalty of imprisonment of not less that three (3) years but not more than seven (7) years and a fine of not less than One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) but not more than Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00), or both, at the discretion of the court shall be imposed upon any person found guilty of violating Section 4 of this Act.

If the violator is a juridical person, its license or franchise shall be automatically be deemed revoked and the persons liable shall be the officers thereof including the editor and reporter in the case of print media, and the station manager, editor and broadcaster in the case of a broadcast media.

If the offender is a public officer or employee, or a professional, he/she shall be administratively liable.

If the offender is an alien, he/she shall be subject to deportation proceedings after serving his/her sentence and payment of fines.

Section 6. Exemption. Nothing contained in this Act, however, shall render it unlawful or punishable for any peace officer, who is authorized by a written order of the court, to use the record or any copy thereof as evidence in any civil, criminal investigation or trial of the crime of photo or video voyeurism: Provided, That such written order shall only be issued or granted upon written application and the examination under oath or affirmation of the applicant and the witnesses he/she may produce, and upon showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that photo or video voyeurism has been committed or is about to be committed, and that the evidence to be obtained is essential to the conviction of any person for, or to the solution or prevention of such, crime.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Username
Password
Forgot Password? | Register